Policy Analysis on Info Sharing
This week, we’ll look at how the HCCIC plans on complementing the work of the NH-ISAC. To get a better sense of how this relationship might work, I spoke with Leo Scanlon, HHS Senior Adviser for Healthcare and Public Health, and Denise Anderson, President of the NH-ISAC.
As we discussed a few weeks ago, the HCCIC and the NH-ISAC have complementary (and potentially overlapping) missions. Both organizations have stated support for the work of the other and are committed to enhancing the work of the other, using the unique skill sets, authorities, and resources that each possess. Let’s look at how the two centers might work with each other as well as other organizations to share information and improve the security of the sector.
To start with, the HCCIC and NH-ISAC already share a technical connection to share indicators – the Automated Indicator Sharing program at DHS. The existence of a technical connection between the centers is a great start, but what information will they be sharing? From the NH-ISAC perspective, the hope is that the HCCIC can provide a single point of contact for HHS components, and other government agencies when necessary. This would be a direct corollary to the role NH-ISAC plays for the sector.
As companies and government agencies grapple with responding to an incident like WannaCry, NH-ISAC and HCCIC can serve to aggregate exchanges of information and questions of response. Specific incident response roles and responsibilities will need to be defined and tested between the centers, which is part of the focus of the grant that NH-ISAC was awarded by ASPR earlier this year. A future edition of this newsletter will look at the output of the grant in depth.
As a reminder, this is the public version of the Hacking Healthcare newsletter. For full analysis of how the HCCIC and NH-ISAC might work together, become a member of NH-ISAC.